Michael Gregor looks at this issue in his 5 minute video: "How did the medical and dental community react to U.S. regulators’ total 180 over water fluoridation, going from presumptively safe to presumptively dangerous?"
ABOUT US AND OUR AIMS
Popular Posts
-
Here's news from the Alliance for Natural Health ; BREAKING NEWS! Water fluoridation presents an “unreasonable risk” to the health of ch...
-
A personal view in a letter to The Telegraph: The publicly-funded British Fluoridation Society which seems to be the force behind a renewed ... -
Campaigners are more active than ever in Hampshire as the threat of fluoridation is coming to them faster than elsewhere - their local press...
-
The Judicial Review re water fluoridation is coming up. It would be good for as many people to attend as possible. 19th and 20th January at ...
-
This is a follow up to today's letter from a chap in Essex commenting on the inability of farmers to remove and bury dead lambs from sca...
-
While our group members are continuing to monitor the situation we have not been meeting as a group regularly. We are delighted that the imm...
-
Letter to Evening Post: If Wallace and Gromit are being 'persuaded' to focus their communication skills towards home energy-saving t...
-
Sir, £42 million to launch a 20 per cent extension to the nation’s water fluoridation programme? What a sad commentary upon the public healt... -
Frances Roden, leader of Stroud District Council, in her reply to Rob Mehta, chair of the "Safe Water campaign for Gloucestershire"... -
Below is the Hampshire Against Fluoridation news item - any support on this would be great.... The Eastleigh by-election provides an excelle...